Recent Posts

Bloggers

  • Alexandre Zanotta
    Alexandre Zanotta, L.L.M. '06, bachelor of law (JD equivalent - 2000) and masters of law (2005) from the Pontifica Universidade Catolica de Sao Paulo (Brazil). Researches such subjects as Corporate, Securities, Banking and International Law.
  • Dan Larkin
    Dan Larkin, a corporate partner in the London office of Squire Sanders & Dempsey, focuses on developments, acquisitions and financings of real estate and infrastructure facilities.
  • David Evans
    David Evans, JD '61, QC, MA, LLM Cambridge, retired as a Senior Circuit Judge in '03. Practiced as a barrister '65-'87, interested in most fields of law including International Law.
  • Eduardo Baeza
    Eduardo Baeza, LLM' 05, is an associate at Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP in New York, and researches such subjects as Public International Law, Human Rights Law and Corporations.
  • Eva Garcia Bouzas
    Eva Garcia Bouzas, lawyer, researches such subjects as International Public Law, Human Rights and the Laws of war.
  • Fabio Polverino
    Fabio Polverino, LL.M.'06, researches on antitrust law issues, especially merger control and cartels. He is also interested in telecommunication regulation, corporate law and governance.
  • Konrad von Hoff
    Konrad von Hoff, LL.M.' 06, has special interest in employment law, international law, and law and economics and Germany.
  • Saul Levmore
    Saul Levmore is Dean of the University of Chicago Law School.

« April 2006 | Main | June 2006 »

May 07, 2006

Privatization: a bitter bite for consumers

In 1990, a century after the enactment of Sherman Act, the Italian Parliament adopted law no. 287, introducing competition law (as it is called in Europe) in Italy, a country with too many monopolies.

Since that date, many privatizations have been carried out. Telecommunications, Energy (oil, gas, electricity, water) and Highways. They have all been extremely profitable, since have allowed the new owners to exploit in the competitive market infrastructures and licences (i.e. essential facilities) respectively built and granted under the public monopoly and paid for by taxpayers money. The economic potential of these companies became clear when they were listed on the Milan stock exchange and many investors slept in tents set in front of the banks' doors to be the first one to buy the newly issued shares. Of course, the shares have been sky-rocketing since their issuance!!!!

Privatization seemed the dawn of a new era of prosperity and many foresaw increased competition and lower prices to the benefit of Italian consumers. The truth, instead, was that the wave of privatizations has replaced the public monopolist with private monopolists. There are several evidences of this phenomenon.

Continue reading "Privatization: a bitter bite for consumers" »