Foreclosure in Indonesia

A dispute between Deutsche Bank and Beckkett Pte Ltd, a Singapore registered group, gained attention among business people both in the western and in the eastern world. It involves one of the first cases following the Asia crisis in the late 90s in which a western creditor to an Indonesian business was able to seize collateral and dispose of it. Therefore, the dispute is relevant both as a legal and as an economic and political issue.

The (undisputed) and simplified facts are as follows: In 1997 Deutsche Bank granted a bridging loan in an amount of $ 100m to a majority owned subsidiary of Beckkett called Asminco Bara Utama. The loan was intended to finance the expansion of Beckkett’s stake from 15% to 40% in Adora Indonesia, one of the largest Indonesian coal mines. The loan was secured by the 40% stake of Beckkett in Adora. Furthermore, Beckkett provided a guarantee. The following year, Asminco defaulted on the loan. After lengthy negotiations Deutsche Bank finally decided to foreclose on the shares and to sell them to another Indonesian business tycoon, Edwin Soeryadjaya, for $ 44.2m.

On February 21, 2006 Beckkett sued Deutsche Bank before the Singapore High Court asking to cancel the sale, return the shares as well as damages and payment for any lost dividends. First, Beckkett claims that Deutsche Bank was obliged under the loan agreement to raise a long term loan agreement when the bridge loan was due. Second, it alleges that Deutsche Bank disposed of the pledged shares at a too low price in order to wind up the guarantor, Beckkett.

Deutsche Bank, counterseeking the remaining amount that is still owed from the loan, both contests the alleged collusion with the buyer when selling the shares and its obligation to raise another loan fund. Moreover, it argues that Beckkett is only interested in the shares of the coal mine company as the price for Indonesian coal has risen significantly after the sale of the shares. With the recent upswing in global commodity prices, that stake is now estimated to be worth more than $400 million.

One Indonesian journalist reports on a blog that one of the parties invited six Indonesian journalists – not including him – to fly to Singapore paying for hotel, air tickets and meals to cover the trial (http://yosef-ardi.blogspot.com/2006/02/beckkett-vs-deutsche-bank-media-law.html). A day later, the journalist reports, an article on the trial was published in the newspaper Bisnis Indonesia. 80% of the article consisted of Beckkett’s arguments. For the journalist, it was clear which party invited the six journalists.

What makes the case so interesting for the business world is less its legal details. More important is its impact on the economic and political situation in the country.

First, Deutsche Bank’s reputation in the entire region is at stake. Critics of Deutsche Bank consider the case as an example of an over-enthusiastic global bank that provided the so called “tiger”-states with credit before the financial crisis of 1997 revealing the weak pillars on which the boom of those countries was founded at the time.

Second, a judgment against Deutsche Bank could be detrimental to Indonesia’s economy. International creditors, private equity investors and hedge funds follow the case closely which has been dogged by endless legal battles over document disclosure and marred by threats of intimidation and harassment. Wolfgang Topp, Deutsche Bank's Asia-Pacific managing director, talks of the bank “being literally held to ransom”, according to court documents. Topp says that he was interrogated by Indonesian police over allegations he was party to “deception or fraud” over the sale of the shares.

In the past, some questionable rulings against foreign investors did a lot of harm to the confidence of foreign investors in Indonesian judges to enforce contracts. The lack of legal recourse is widely considered as one of the major obstacles for foreign companies to invest in Indonesia. In case of a judgment against Deutsche Bank, Indonesia’s President, Susilo Bambang Yudhyono, will have a hard time to persuade foreign companies to invest in Indonesia, which is south-east Asia’s largest economy.

A verdict is not expected before next June.

Comments

[Donald Morris]

Stop foreclosure today, we offer foreclosure help nationwide. http://www.877youkeep.com

[Brent Jarvis]

Avoid stop foreclosure scams. Free unbiased ethical solutions to stop your foreclosure.
http://www.delegatemyrealestate.com

[EnTrust]

Interesting article and to see how handled in other parts of the world.

[Thomas Martin]

Stop Foreclosure Loans FLorida,

[Thomas Martin]

http://www.fhamortgageprograms.com/mortgage/foreclosure-help.shtml
Stop Foreclosure FLorida

[Tim]

Stop Foreclosure Nationwide.

[Tim]

http://www.2-stop-foreclosure.com
Stop Foreclosure Nationwide.
Don't turn over your property rights
to anyone! Stop foreclosure, keep your home.

[entrust]

Interesting article and to see how handled in other parts of the world. http://www.entrusthome.com

[Transfer of structured settlement payment right]

I trust that who decide case without hearing the other side, though he decides justly, cannot be committeemen just.

[Foreclosure Questions]

In the past, some questionable rulings against foreign investors did a lot of harm to the confidence of foreign investors in Indonesian judges to enforce contracts.

Interesting...

[Udi]

Great site. Very informative

[info bisnis peluang usaha]

thanks for great article you post here.
it's help me to past finding what i'm looking for.
Thanks a lot